Politics Wires

Parental notification before abortion ruled constitutional by Alaska judge

 

The Anchorage Daily News

An Anchorage Superior Court judge has upheld as constitutional a state law requiring parents to be notified before a teen's abortion. But the issue may not be resolved. Both sides expect it will wind up before the state Supreme Court.

Judge John Suddock, in a 65-page decision issued Monday, said the legal requirement does not violate a teenager's right to privacy. Nor, the judge ruled, does it violate provisions to treat people equally even though a pregnant teen generally cannot receive an abortion without her parents' knowing, but could get prenatal care.

The law applies to Alaska teenagers age 17 and younger. It says abortion providers must generally inform parents before performing an abortion. Girls can get around the requirement by going to a judge or providing the doctor with notarized statements attesting to abuse at home. Pro-choice advocates say that's a lot to ask of a girl in crisis.

The law came about through an August 2010 voter initiative that was fiercely contested. Most aspects of it took effect that December.

Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and two doctors sued to block the law, arguing that it could delay or prevent vulnerable girls from receiving an abortion because of the legal hoops and complicated mechanisms. The state argued to keep the law in place, saying that parents should be involved in such an important decision.

The issues were aired during a three-week trial in February and March.

"We said, 'Have there been girls put into difficult situations because of this law?'" recalled Margaret Paton Walsh, an assistant attorney general who was part of the state's trial team defending the law. "And the answer to that question was 'Not really.' ... The girls who wanted abortions have gotten abortions."

But not always easily, witnesses on the other side testified.

The number of teen abortions in Alaska dropped significantly in 2011, the first full year after the law was put into place. That year, 87 Alaska girls age 17 and under received abortions, down 23 percent from 113 in 2010, which was a drop from 125 in 2009, according to the state Bureau of Vital Statistics.

Both sides agree one year is too short a time, and that the numbers alone provide too little information, to determine whether the parental notification requirement played a role.

Teen pregnancy also is on the decline because of teens delaying sex and more effective birth control, including injections that last three months, said Clover Simon, Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest spokeswoman.

Most teens, especially young ones, involved their parents in their abortion decision even before the law took hold, she said. Planned Parenthood is Alaska's main abortion provider, and parents typically accompany daughters to its clinics. Even if the young woman shows up without parents, they often already know, she said.

"But there are a small number of teens who have tenuous circumstances at home and don't enjoy the same communication that other teens have with their parents and for whatever reason they are not able to talk to their parents and they choose to go through judicial bypass," Simon said.

Besides upholding the overall law, Suddock struck some aspects, while reinstating others -- including the possibility of criminal penalties -- that had been blocked since a preliminary ruling in December 2010.

Suddock ruled that:

• Doctors and clinics who perform abortions without ensuring parents are notified can face criminal prosecution. That element had been on hold. But he struck a provision allowing civil damages against providers.

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  

President Barack Obama reacts to CODEPINK founder Medea Benjamin as she shouts at him from the back of the auditorium during his speech about national security, Thursday, May 23, 2013, at the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington.

    Obama addressing Naval Academy graduates 2nd time

    A day after laying out his counterterrorism vision, President Barack Obama is addressing future military leaders who could help carry it out in a speech to U.S. Naval Academy graduates.

  • Obama's drone policy at a glance

    President Barack Obama defended the United States' use of drone attacks as an important part of the U.S. counterterrorism policy on Thursday but signed new presidential policy guidelines to spell out for Congress and the public the standards that the U.S. will use before carrying out drone attacks.

  •  

President Barack Obama reacts as his speech is interrupted by CODEPINK founder Medea Benjamin, as he talked about national security, Thursday, May 23, 2013, at the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington.

    Counting US drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen

    President Barack Obama said Thursday that he will engage Congress in exploring a number of options for increased oversight of lethal drone strikes outside of war zones like Afghanistan.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category