Editorials

Amendment 8 OUR OPINION: Vote No on this blatant attempt to fund religious schools

 

OUR OPINION: Blatant attempt to fund religious private schools

HeraldEd@MiamiHerald.com

Amendment 8 has a convoluted history. This proposal, which would remove a 126-year state constitutional provision known as the Blaine Amendment that prohibits taxpayer funding of religious institutions, began life as Amendment 7. That proposal was challenged in court by several education groups, and in December 2011, Leon County Circuit Judge Terry Lewis ruled that the Legislature’s measure was deceptively worded and removed it from the ballot.

The lawsuit also challenged a new law that allows the Florida attorney general to rewrite rejected proposed amendments. The judge didn’t overturn the new law, which requires the attorney general to rewrite the proposal within 10 days of the court’s decision.

Attorney General Pam Bondi promptly rewrote the wording of the measure, placing the proposal back on the ballot as Amendment 8. Now called the Florida Religious Freedom Amendment, it states that no individual or entity may be denied, on the basis of religious identity or belief, government benefits, funding or other support — except as required by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Then it proposes removing the Blaine Amendment from the Florida Constitution.

Local school boards rightly oppose Amendment 8, as it would open the door wide for a student voucher program, where state taxpayers’ money would be used to pay for tuition at private religious schools.

Supporters insist the amendment is needed because pending lawsuits threaten the ability of religiously affiliated organizations to provide services to the needy under government contracts. Yet the courts have made clear that contracting services with such groups as Catholic Charities, Habitat for Humanity or Jewish Community Services to feed the poor, house the homeless or help immigrants would not be imperiled. These organizations already are eligible for — and receive — federal and state dollars to operate many such programs.

We find this amendment still disingenuously worded. The proposal is not about religious freedom at all, but rather a blatant attempt to use public money to finance private religious institutions.

On Amendment 8, The Miami Herald recommends: Vote No.

Read more Editorials stories from the Miami Herald

  •  

Chris Bosh snuffs a three point attempt to seal the win.

    Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Spunk and luck

    OUR OPINION: Win or lose the championship, Miami should celebrate the Heat as a symbol of who we are

  • Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Food aid that works

    OUR OPINION: Loosening U.S. shipping and growing requirements would deliver more food to hungry people in nations in crisis

  • Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Give nod to Pets’ Trust

    OUR OPINION: Miami-Dade Commission should approve cost-effective spay, neuter programs

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category