Other Views

In my opinion

Chick-Fil-A protest could boomerang

 

For two years now, a good many citizens in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, in connivance with local politicians and courts, have been fighting the construction of a mosque in their town. They’ve used a number of legal subterfuges, even arguing in court that Islam is not a religion, which probably came as a surprise to the world’s billion or so Muslims, though not Tennessee’s astute lieutenant governor, who keenly observed that Islam is more likely a “a nationality, a way of life or cult, whatever you want to call it.”

But outside courtrooms, the mosque opponents are pretty blunt about their real motivation: They just don’t want any Muslims butting into their town. “I didn’t say to hate ’em,” one man told CNN. “I’m just saying we don’t need ’em here.” Said another to Time magazine: “I respect their rights to worship as they see fit, but I’m not certain this promotes domestic tranquility.”

Murfreesboro’s embrace of the idea that government can be used to keep out anybody you don’t like, First Amendment be damned, has made the place a national poster child for backwoods ignorance and yahooism. But last week brought some happy news for the Murfreesboro chamber of commerce: Just proclaim your town a citadel of progressive thought, point out that Muslims don’t share your values, and then flat-out ban ’em. If anybody complains, invoke the magic words: Chick-Fil-A.

Progressive politicians from coast to coast were lining up last week to keep Chick-Fil-A’s fried-chicken restaurants out of their towns after the company’s president Dan Cathy made statements that suggested (more on that in a minute) he opposes gay marriage. Chicago alderman Joe Moreno, called Cathy “bigoted” and “homophobic” and added: “Because of this man’s ignorance, I will now be denying Chick-Fil-A’s permit to open a restaurant in the 1st Ward.” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said that goes for the entire city: “Chick-Fil-A values are not Chicago values.”

Boston Mayor Thomas Menino immediately chimed in with a pledge to fight a planned Chick-Fil-A in his city. “It doesn’t send the right message to the country,” he explained. “We’re a leader when it comes to social justice and opportunities for all.” And in San Francisco, Mayor Ed Lee launched a barrage of threats on Twitter: “Very disappointed #ChickFilA doesn’t share San Francisco’s values & strong commitment to equality for everyone . . . Closest #ChickFilA to San Francisco is 40 miles away & I strongly recommend that they not to try to come any closer.”

So what was it Cathy said to get his company banned from three of the largest cities in America? A reporter from a Baptist magazine, the Biblical Recorder, asked him about his “company’s support of the traditional family.” Replied Cathy: “Well, guilty as charged . . . We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that.”

Not a word was spoken, by either Cathy or the reporter, about gay marriage, gay rights or gay anything at all. Nobody said anything about what kind of laws should be passed or rejected, or what kind of politicians should be elected or kicked out. If a man saying he’s proud to be married to a woman now amounts to homophobia, does that also mean that gay-pride marches are heterophobic?

But let’s accept for a moment the thinnnnnnn logic equation that preference for heterosexual marriage equals opposition to gay marriage and opposition to gay marriage equals homophobia. And let’s accept further that the First Amendment means no more in Boston, Chicago or San Francisco than it does in Murfreesboro, and that these cities are all free to close down businesses operated by anyone who doesn’t share their “values.”

You know who the big loser will be in that scenario? Progressives and their companies. Because, like it or not, they’re the ones who don’t share majority values. Across America, the right to gay marriage has appeared on the ballot 32 times over the past few years, and it has lost every single time. Only six states and the District of Columbia issue licenses for same-sex marriages. (If the mayors of San Francisco and Chicago are really sincere in wanting to keep out everybody who doesn’t believe in gay marriage, they ought to secede from their states; neither Illinois nor California permit same-sex marriage.)

If pandering progressive politicians are allowed to put Chick-Fil-A out of business, you can bet that the folks on the other side will be doing the same to Amazon.com, whose founders just donated $2.5 million to support a gay-marriage initiative in Washington State. Say so long to Oreos (Nabisco, earlier this summer, put them in a bag featuring a cookie with a multicolored gay-pride stuffing) as well as Cheerios, Pillsbury pastries and Green Giant vegetables (owner General Mills is opposing a Minnesota constituional amendment that would outlaw gay marriage). JC Penney, which has put pictures of gay dads in its catalogs and uses Ellen Degeneres as its spokeswoman, will be history. And we’ll all be living in Murfreesboro.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  •  

300 dpi Rick Nease illustration of a divided America being stitched together. (The Detroit Free Press/MCT)

    HIGHER EDUCATION

    Shalala, Padron: Humanities, social sciences for a vibrant, competitive, secure nation

    Our national dialogue on higher education places much emphasis, and rightly so, on college graduates’ “employability.” With the rising cost of attending a college causing families to take on greater financial debt, many weigh the merits of a college degree by its potential return on investment as measured in future wages.

  •  

300 dpi Paul Gonzales illustration of magnifying glass enlarging thumbprint. Los Angeles Times 2011<p>

02000000; CLJ; krtcrime crime; krtnational national; krtworld world; krt; krtcampus campus; mctillustration; 02001000; CRI; fingerprint; la contributed gonzales; magnifying glass; 2011; krt2011

    SUPREME COURT

    Supreme Court: No proof of citizenship required — sort of

    By a surprising 7-2 majority, the Supreme Court this week struck down a bristly little ballot initiative that Arizona passed in 2004, requiring everyone who registers to vote to prove his or her citizenship. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion, and he had everyone on board except Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito.

  •  

GERSON

    POLITICS

    GOP’s leadership challenge: lessons from the UK

    It is often argued, including by me, that the GOP needs its own Bill Clinton or Tony Blair — a leader to reposition the party and reinvigorate its political appeal. But if these figures are examples of successful reform, British Prime Minister David Cameron is a warning of its perils.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category