Obama asks Congress for limited extension of Bush tax cuts

 

McClatchy Newspapers

President Barack Obama expressed confidence Monday that he can win an election-year fight with Republicans over taxes and the economy despite three straight months of weak job growth.

Obama urged Congress to pass a one-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for most Americans, but aides said he would veto a bill that included providing relief to households earning $250,000 or more, as GOP congressional leaders and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney want to do.

“Let’s not hold the vast majority of Americans hostage and our entire economy hostage while we debate the merits of another tax cut for the wealthy,” Obama said in the White House’s ornate East Room.

Obama’s appeal drew a disdainful response from Republicans on Capitol Hill.

“President Obama is still asleep at the switch when it comes to our economy and jobs,” said House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio.

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel noted that Obama made his pitch “just days after another dismal jobs report,” which showed the unemployment rate holding at 8.2 percent in June and the economy adding only 80,000 jobs during the month.

While Obama’s aides denied that his appeal was a political move aimed at distracting attention from Friday’s disappointing employment numbers for June, the president claimed broad political support for his refusal to back across-the-board tax relief after Dec. 31, when the Bush tax cuts are set to expire.

“The American people are with me on this,” he said. “Poll after poll shows that’s the case.”

Obama upped the ante by framing the November election as a referendum on his advocacy of middle-class tax cuts vs. Romney’s desire to extend tax relief to all Americans regardless of income.

“In many ways, the fate of the tax cut for the wealthiest Americans will be decided by the outcome of the next election,” Obama said. “My opponent will fight to keep them in place. I will fight to end them.”

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, readily accepted the challenge.

“President Obama’s response to even more bad economic news is a massive tax increase,” said Romney campaign spokesman Chris Walker. “It just proves again that the president doesn’t have a clue how to get America working again and help the middle class.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney tussled with reporters who asked him why Obama, in December 2010 when the Bush tax cuts were originally set to end, backed unrestricted tax relief but now wants to limit it to families earning less than $250,000 a year.

Carney said Obama’s stance then was a political tradeoff as part of a larger political deal with congressional Republicans that included extension of unemployment benefits and payroll tax reductions.

Carney said flat out that Obama would veto any Republican plan to extend the current tax cuts for all Americans. But the Obama spokesman repeatedly declined to make the same vow when reporters asked him about a proposal floated by some Democratic congressional leaders to limit tax hikes to households earning at least $1 million.

Obama and his aides tread a thin line in trying to explain his position.

Obama said Bush’s tax cuts “didn’t work” and blamed his “top-down economics” for the 2008 economic collapse and subsequent Great Recession.

At the same time, Obama called for extending the same tax cuts to what he said would be 98 percent of all Americans were the $250,000 household income cap – with a limit of $200,000 for individuals – to be imposed.

Obama said the lower tax rates for affluent Americans are “a major contributor to our (federal budget) deficit, costing us a trillion dollars over the next decade.”

Yet that price tag is a fraction of the current federal debt of almost $16 trillion, and the “tax cuts for the middle class” that Obama advocates would reduce by trillions more dollars government revenues that could make a bigger dent in the debt.

Budget-watchdog groups such as the Concord Coalition, a bipartisan group dedicated to slashing the deficit, criticized Obama’s stance.

“Obviously this is intended to be a campaign talking point to highlight the differences between the two candidates,” said Robert Bixby, the organization’s executive directly.

“It’s certainly not the deficit fix that is needed,” Bixby said. “There is nothing new about this proposal. It’s kind of frustrating that we keep going over the same ground on these things without addressing the issues.”

Most economists believe that a mix of tax hikes and spending cuts are needed to cut the debt significantly. A special commission Obama appointed soon after taking office in January 2009 recommended such an approach, but the president and congressional leaders from both parties largely ignored the panel’s advice.

Romney wants to go further than Bush by reducing current tax rates by an additional 20 percent for all Americans. He hasn’t said how he would pay for the plan, though he wants to cut federal spending to 20 percent of gross domestic product, down from its present 24 percent level.

Romney says he would work to "slowly raise the retirement age" for future Social Security recipients, while slowing the growth in benefits for “higher-income retirees." On Medicare, Romney said the private sector would “compete to offer insurance coverage at the lowest possible price,” while raising the Medicare eligibility age by one month each year from its current threshold of 65.

Romney’s approach would add $2.6 trillion to the federal debt through 2021, according to U.S. Budget Watch, a nonpartisan watchdog group.

While reinforcing the election’s sharply drawn battle lines, Obama acknowledged that he’s in for a fight.

“What’s holding us back from meeting these challenges – it’s not a lack of plans, it’s a lack of ideas,” the president said. “It is a stalemate in this town, in Washington, between two very different views about which direction we should go in as a country. And nowhere is that stalemate more pronounced than on the issue of taxes.”

Republicans hotly dispute Obama’s claim of Bush’s failed economic policies, saying the economy grew for more than six years after his first round of tax cuts in 2001 and before the 2008 crash.

The Republican-controlled House is expected later this month to pass a one-year extension of across-the-board tax cuts, but the Democratic-led Senate almost certainly will not follow suit.

Kevin G. Hall of the Washington Bureau contributed.

Email:jrosen@mcclatchydc.com; dlightman@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter:@lightmandavid; @jamesmartinrose

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
FILE This Feb. 13, 2014 photo shows Rep. Steve Daines, R-Mont., left, speaking at a news conference with Montana Attorney General Tim Fox,  in Helena, Mont. Daines is running against Democrat John Walsh for the Senate seat Democrat Max Baucus left earlier this year. Max Baucus’ decision not to seek re-election to the Senate after 35 years opened the door for Republicans to pick up one of the six Democratic seats they need to recapture control of the Senate. But his early resignation after being named U.S. ambassador to China may have bolstered Democratic prospects of retaining the seat they have held for a century, thanks to the value of incumbency.

    Baucus casts wide shadow over Montana Senate race

    Max Baucus' decision not to seek re-election to the Senate after 35 years opened the door for Republicans to pick up one of the six Democratic seats they need to recapture control of the Senate. But his early resignation after being named U.S. ambassador to China may have bolstered Democratic prospects of retaining the seat they've held for a century, thanks to the value of incumbency.

  • NBA plans expanded programs with military

    Army graduate Mike Krzyzewski will lead a U.S. national team practice at his alma mater, and the U.S. women will train at the Naval Academy as part of an increased partnership among the NBA, USA Basketball and the Department of Defense.

  • Court declines to block drug ruling in patent case

    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday declined to temporarily block a lower court ruling that opens the world's best-selling multiple sclerosis drug to competition from generic rivals next month.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category