Andres Oppenheimer

In My Opinion

Mexico’s election may resurrect authoritarian party

 

aoppenheimer@MiamiHerald.com

Peña Nieto aides reject the notion that his government would be authoritarian, because much of the presidency’s powers have shifted to the states in recent years, and because they say he is by nature a consensus-seeking politician.

Peña Nieto says that his top priorities would be to carry out long-delayed health care, labor, tax and energy reforms, including a greater opening of the state-owned Pemex oil monopoly to the private sector, as well as to reduce the drug-related violence that has left about 50,000 dead over the past five years.

He says that he would double the size of Mexico’s Federal Police’s elite units and — without abandoning the war on drugs — focus on homicides, kidnappings and human trafficking.

“We will separate common crimes from drug trafficking,” says Silvia Hernandez, a top PRI politician. “Much of the violence we see today comes from bands that are not tied to drug trafficking.”

Peña Nieto’s aides hope that, if wins by a landslide, his job would be made much easier because he would be the first Mexican president in more than a decade to enjoy a majority in Congress.

“There would be much bigger chances of approving all pending reforms,” Manlio Fabio Beltrones, the likely head of the PRI congressional bloc, told me in an interview, citing that most of the country’s reforms have been stuck in Congress because of lack of agreement between the three major parties.

But critics point out that a PRI government would not pass any significant reforms, because it would not risk its alliances with the country’s biggest and best-organized labor unions. What’s worst, old habits never die, and that PRI would not be able to shed its penchant for corruption, critics say.

For nearly a century, the PRI has been the champion of “crony capitalism” — its sweet deals with friendly business barons were the source of most of today’s biggest Mexican fortunes — vote-buying, electoral fraud, and a combination of bribery and intimidation schemes to control the media, they say.

While Peña Nieto’s team includes some new faces, most of them belong to the old PRI, they say. It’s no coincidence that an old joke about the PRI’s shady governance methods, said to have originated during the party’s first presidents after the Mexican Revolution, says that “no Mexican general can resist a cannonade of $50,000.”

Peña Nieto would engage in heavy borrowing, give out massive subsidies to buy votes, and leave the country badly indebted, his critics say.

“They would use the public budget to perpetuate themselves in power,” Julio Castellanos, a congressman of President Felipe Calderon’s National Action Party (PAN), told me. “They are not seeking to return to power for the next six years, but for the remainder of the 21st Century, creating a citizens’ dependence on government subsidies.”

Castellanos added that “this is not speculation, but a fact. It’s what the PRI has been doing in virtually all of the 22 states where it governs.”

My opinion: While the election will be much closer than the polls suggest, Peña Nieto is likely to win. His PRI party is the best organized, he has poured many times more money than his rivals into television ads, and many Mexicans seem willing to live with tolerable levels of corruption in exchange for less violence and the promise of greater prosperity.

It’s a dangerous bargain, because in the long run corruption breeds instability and paves the way for messianic leaders. But elections are not about the long run.

A Peña Nieto victory would probably not turn Mexico into the “perfect dictatorship” that it was during much of the 20th Century, but it could turn it into a more imperfect democracy than it has been over the past decade.

Read more Andres Oppenheimer stories from the Miami Herald

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: OAS report breaks ground on marijuana

    Latin American presidents who support decriminalization of marijuana won a big diplomatic victory in recent days when the 34-country Organization of American States issued a report that considers that option as one of several policies that might help reduce the region’s drug-related violence.

  • The Oppenheimer Report

    Andres Oppenheimer: World science map grim for Latin America

    The highly respected Nature Scientific Reports journal has just published a map of the world’s leading science cities, and it looks pretty bad for emerging countries: It shows the planet’s northern hemisphere full of lights, and the south almost solidly dark.

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: What Obama didn’t say about Latin America

    I’ve read with great attention President Barack Obama’s article in The Miami Herald earlier this week on how to improve U.S. relations with Latin America. It was pretty disappointing.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category