Miami-Dade

Trayvon Martin case

Judge orders Zimmerman back to jail

 

Prosecutors say Zimmerman and his wife misled the judge during an April bond hearing about how much money they had access to.

More information

Here’s part of the transcript of the jailhouse phone conversation George Zimmerman had with this wife on April 16, four days before Zimmerman’s bond hearing. Prosecutors say the couple was using code to disguise how much money they had. On April 19, the day before the bond hearing, the couple had more than $135,000 in their credit union accounts, prosecutors said.

George Zimmerman: In my account do I have at least $100?

Shellie Zimmerman: No

GZ: How close am I?

SZ: $8. $8.60

GZ: Really? So total everything how much are we looking at?

SZ: Like $155.


shiaasen@MiamiHerald.com

Prosecutors also accused Zimmerman of failing to turn over a second passport he owns as a condition of his bail. O’Mara said Zimmerman had lost his passport several years ago and obtained a new one, only to later discover the original passport when moving recently. Once he discovered the original passport, Zimmerman gave it to his lawyer. The judge sided with the defense and found that Zimmerman did not deliberately hide the second passport.

Also on Friday, Judge Lester said he would grant in large part the requests of The Miami Herald and other media organizations to make public more of the evidence gathered in the case and now kept under seal.

Last month, prosecutors released much of the witness statements and other evidence in the case, but withheld some key materials, including the names of witnesses and transcripts of statements Zimmerman gave to investigators.

Prosecutors argued that Zimmerman’s statements to police amounted to confessions, which are exempt from public-records law. But the judge said Zimmerman’s statements would likely bolster Zimmerman’s defense.

Lester said he would spend the next 30 days reviewing the material before deciding what should be released and what, if anything, must be withheld to ensure a fair trial for Zimmerman.

De la Rionda and O’Mara argued that witness names should be withheld to protect them from potential threats in the high-profile case, and that the release of other information could fuel the hothouse atmosphere of the case and prevent Zimmerman from getting a fair trial.

But the judge said he expected about 90 percent of the information requested by the media would be released — though he’s not pleased about it.

“The law basically favors full, complete and open disclosures,” the judge said. “It’s the law that we’re stuck with, unfortunately.”

Miami Herald staff writer Frances Robles contributed to this story.

Read more Miami-Dade stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category