Guantánamo

  • Logout
  • Member Center

WAR COURT

Defenders seek 9/11 trial delay, blame Guantánamo legal mail dispute

 

This time, Pentagon defense lawyers are citing a new Guantánamo prison camp controversy involving inspection of confidential mail in their request for a delay in the Sept. 11 mass murder case.

crosenberg@MiamiHerald.com

Lawyers for the 9/11 plot suspects on Thursday sought to delay until this summer filing memos on why the terror tribunal should not go forward as a capital case.

If a senior Pentagon official agrees, the soonest the alleged mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his accused four co-conspirators would get initial appearances at Guantánamo’s Camp Justice would be around the next Sept. 11 anniversary.

At issue is an ethical dispute over how the Guantánamo prison commander is reviewing confidential communications between Pentagon lawyers and their captive clients. Defense lawyers stopped sending so-called privileged mail to their clients late last year after the Chief Defense Counsel, Marine Col. Jeffrey Colwell, declared the policy of reviewing mail unethical.

Colwell said Thursday that all five 9/11 defense teams were seeking the delay because the controversial camp mail policy “complicated the attorneys’ ability to prepare.”

Prosecutors are now working with the camps commander, Rear Adm. David B. Woods, to devise a new mail system that’s blessed by the chief war court judge. No solution is expected before April.

The attorney for Ramzi bin al Shibh, a Yemeni accused of orchestrating part of the mass murder from Hamburg, Germany, asked for a delay until August. Another lawyer asked for a four-month delay on behalf of Mustafa al Hawsawi, who is accused of helping to move some of the money that financed the Sept. 11 hijackers’ travels.

A Pentagon spokesman, David Oten, said the request for an extension was under consideration.

The Obama administration cleared the way for a 9/11 tribunal in April. Prosecutors swore out death-penalty charges May 31.

Since then, the Pentagon has been assembling defense teams. .

The teams are supposed to write a senior Pentagon official overseeing the war court, retired Vice Adm. Bruce MacDonald, by Monday on why the case shouldn’t go forward.

A Navy war-crimes prosecutor defended the new mail policy at a hearing last month by disclosing that a copy of al Qaida’s now defunct Inspire magazine had reached the detention center. Prison-camp commanders won’t discuss when or how the alleged security breach happened in the Pentagon’s showcase prison, which has a staff of 1,875 U.S. forces and civilians and 171 detainees.

dealsaver
The Miami Herald: Subscribe now!

More from
Guantánamo

  •  

From left: Mustafa al Hawsawi, Ammar al Baluchi, Ramzi bin al Shibh, Walid Bin Attash, also spelled Waleed bin Attash,left, and Khalik Sheik Mohammad, pray at their arraignment Saturday, May 5, 2012.  This sketch was reviewed and approved for release by a U.S. military security official.

    WAR COURT

    Accused 9/11 planners might get separate Guantánamo trials

    The judge in the legal proceeding against five men accused of having roles in the 9/11 terror attacks is considering whether to separate the trials.

  •  

The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington on March 28, 2012.

    High court will take up wiretaps lawsuit

    The Supreme Court says it will consider shutting down a legal challenge to a law that lets the United States eavesdrop on overseas communications. It took no action on a Guantánamo detainee challenge.

  •  

Navy Cmdr. Walter Ruiz, a military attorney, has defended Canadian Omar Khadr and Saudi Mustafa al Hawsawi at Guantanamo.

    US officials sought to testify in Gitmo 9/11 trial

    Defense teams in the Sept. 11 case at Guantanamo are asking a military judge to order senior U.S. government officials to testify at the U.S. base in Cuba as part of a motion to dismiss charges, a lawyer for one of the defendants said Tuesday.

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

We have introduced a new commenting system called Disqus for our articles. This allows readers the option of signing in using their Facebook, Twitter, Disqus or existing MiamiHerald.com username and password.

Having problems? Read more about the commenting system on MiamiHerald.com.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK
0 comments

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category