Nation

  • Logout
  • Member Center

Marines promoted inflated story for Medal of Honor winner

 

Ambush at Ganjgal

McClatchy's Jonathan Landay talks about what he saw during a Sept. 8, 2009 ambush by insurgents outside Ganjgal, Afghanistan.

Fact versus Fiction: Medal of Honor

McClatchy dissects statements made by President Obama in awarding the Medal of Honor to Dakota Meyer.

Similar stories:

  • Taliban lead attacks on U.S. bases and government sites across Afghanistan

  • Afghan leader: airstrikes could undermine US pact

  • U.S. probes video of marines urinating on dead Afghans

  • Video of Marines urinating on bodies no surprise, Afghans say

  • Afghan insurgents post propaganda videos on latest attacks

McClatchy Newspapers

With Dakota Meyer standing at attention in his dress uniform, sweat glistening on his forehead under the television lights, President Barack Obama extolled the former Marine corporal for the "extraordinary actions" that had earned him the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest award for valor.

Obama told the audience in the White House East Room on Sept. 15 that Meyer had driven into the heart of a savage ambush in eastern Afghanistan against orders. He'd killed insurgents at near-point-blank range, twice leapt from his gun turret to rescue two dozen Afghan soldiers and saved the lives of 13 U.S. service members as he fought to recover the bodies of four comrades, the president said.

But there's a problem with this account: Crucial parts that the Marine Corps publicized and Obama described are untrue, unsubstantiated or exaggerated, according to dozens of military documents McClatchy Newspapers examined.

Sworn statements by Meyer and others who participated in the battle indicate that he didn't save the lives of 13 U.S. service members, leave his vehicle to scoop up 24 Afghans on his first two rescue runs or lead the final push to retrieve the four dead Americans. Moreover, it's unclear from the documents whether Meyer disobeyed orders when he entered the Ganjgal Valley on Sept. 8, 2009.

The statements also offer no proof that the 23-year-old Kentucky native "personally killed at least eight Taliban insurgents," as the account on the Marine Corps website says. The driver of Meyer's vehicle attested to seeing "a single enemy go down."

What's most striking is that all this probably was unnecessary. Meyer, the 296th Marine to earn the medal, by all accounts deserved his nomination. At least seven witnesses attested to him performing heroic deeds "in the face of almost certain death."

Braving withering fire, he repeatedly returned to the ambush site with Army Capt. William Swenson and others to retrieve Afghan casualties and the dead Americans. He suffered a shrapnel wound in one arm and was sent home after the battle with combat-related stress. Meyer's commander, Lt. Col. Kevin Williams, commended him for acts of "conspicuous gallantry at the risk of his life ... above and beyond the call of duty."

But an exhaustive assessment by a McClatchy correspondent who was embedded with the unit and survived the ambush found that the Marines' official accounts of Meyer's deeds - retold in a book, countless news reports and on U.S. military websites - were embellished. They're marred by errors and inconsistencies, ascribe actions to Meyer that are unverified or didn't happen and create precise, almost novelistic detail out of the jumbled and contradictory recollections of the Marines, soldiers and pilots engaged in battle.

The approval of Meyer's medal - in an unusually short time - came as lawmakers and serving and former officers pressed the military services and the Pentagon to award more Medals of Honor because of the relatively few conferred in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Only 10 of the decorations have been awarded since 2001, seven of them posthumously.

Meyer is the first living Marine since the Vietnam War to be awarded the honor. It was first bestowed in 1863.

The process for awarding the medal - designed by Navy rules to leave "no margin of doubt or possibility of error" - involves reviews by commanders at every level of the nominee's chain of command and then by top Pentagon officials. The nominating papers - known as a "medal packet" - typically comprise dozens of sworn witness statements, maps, diagrams, a draft citation and a more detailed account of the nominee's deeds.

(Nancy A. Youssef contributed to this report.)
dealsaver
The Miami Herald: Subscribe now!

More from
Nation

  •  

Police clash with demonstrators protesting the NATO Summit during a march through downtown streets on May 20, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. Today is the first day of the two-day summit.

    NATO SUMMIT

    Leaders expected to agree on Afghanistan exit plan

    U.S. officials said NATO is poised to OK a plan in which Afghan forces will take the lead in combat operations sooner than expected.

  •  

NATO protestors form a sit-in in response to a police barricade of bicycles, Saturday, May 19, 2012, in Chicago. Security has been high throughout the city in preparation for the NATO summit, where delegations from about 60 countries will discuss the war in Afghanistan and European missile defense.

    Chicago braces for final day of NATO protests

    Chicago braced for more demonstrations Monday, with protesters vowing to march to the Boeing Corp. headquarters a day after police clashed with a group of demonstrators at the end of a march protesting the NATO summit.

  •  

Trayvon Martin's parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, confer with prosecutor Angela Corey,right, at an April bond hearing.

    State vs. Zimmerman

    What the Trayvon evidence doesn’t show

    Records released last week show little evidence that George Zimmerman acted with malice when he shot Trayvon Martin. That could pose a problem for prosecutors.

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

We have introduced a new commenting system called Disqus for our articles. This allows readers the option of signing in using their Facebook, Twitter, Disqus or existing MiamiHerald.com username and password.

Having problems? Read more about the commenting system on MiamiHerald.com.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK
0 comments

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category