Florida

  • Logout
  • Member Center

Casino bill faces resistance even in normally friendly committee

 

The Senate sponsor of the casino resort bill offers to make a series of changes to the proposal as opposition mounts even among gambling friendly senators.

Herald/Times Tallahassee Bureau

The Senate sponsor of a bill to bring destination resort casinos to South Florida faced a hostile first committee Wednesday even as economists came up with a new projection that shows the project will bring the state a windfall of between $327 million and $455 million in new revenue.

A majority of the members of the Senate Regulated Industries Committee, traditionally a welcome place for casino expansion legislation, told Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff they’d like to see significant changes to the bill before they agree to support it.

Bogdanoff, for the first time, outlined the changes she is willing to make to strengthen support for the measure that would allow for three $2 billion resort casinos in Miami Dade and Broward. And legislative economist Amy Baker detailed the first independent economic analysis she has done of the proposed bill.

Baker said that if the bill becomes law, three resort casinos could generate between $1.3 billion to $2.6 billion in annual gaming each year, beginning in 2016.

It is based on annual visitors streaming to the resorts, ranging from 6.6 million to 14 million. She predicts that it will result in the annual loss of up to $250 million in revenue form the Seminole gaming compact but be offset by about $172 million to $206 million in one-time sales tax revenues from construction and annual tax revenues of between $127 million to $255 million.

A major negative impact will be the cannibalization of the games from the existing pari-mutuel industry, Baker said. She estimates that 31 percent of the new gaming will come at the expense of the existing casinos – two thirds of it from the Seminole Hard Rock casinos and 34 percent from Miami Dade and Broward’s slot racinos.

But weighing all the changes, Baker said, by 2016 the net benefit to the state will be between $327.5 million and $455 million.

Bogdanoff, however, said her goal is not to produce an economic benefit to the state but instead to end the patchwork of gambling regulations and replace predatory gaming with gambling intended to draw high end clients.

Among the changes Bogdanoff said she will introduce before the bill comes up for a vote the first week of the legislative session in January are:

- Give the South Florida pari-mutuels the same full-casino games but tax them, at the same rate as the resort casinos only after they increase the investment. For example, the pari-mutuels would be given a tax rate of 35 percent slot machines and 45 percent for all other casino games but that rate could be lowered based on the dollar value of new investment, she said.

- Increase the application fee from $25 million to $125 million, in an attempt to back stop the drop in revenue from the Indian gaming compact and buy out existing pari-mutuel permits for facilities willing to close down.

- Transfer control of the Department of the Lottery to the proposed Gaming Control Commission – a move that was greeted by significant opposition by members of the committee.

Her changes are designed to win over reluctant lawmakers, such Democrats Nan Rich of Weston and Maria Sachs from Delray Beach and Republican Charlie Dean of Inverness, who each said they wanted to see stronger protections for the existing pari-mutuels.

Sen. Dennis Jones, R-Seminole, chairman of the committee, said he wanted to see a higher tax rate — of about 25 percent — for the casino games and wanted the headquarters of the Gaming Control Commission to be in Tallahassee instead of South Florida.

Sen. John Thrasher, a Jacksonville Republican and former House speaker, wants to close the loopholes in existing law that have allow strip mall Internet cafes operate as sweepstakes games and barrel racing in North Florida to become a pari-mutuel competition but opposes the bill.

“I think this legislation is a major change in the culture and brand of the state of Florida and, frankly, I think it expands gambling to the point where I’m concerned about it,’’ he said.

It is the same argument made by the Florida Chamber of Commerce which is lobbying against the bill on behalf of Disney and the Central Florida theme park and tourism industry. As he spoke two former Republican House speakers, Allan Bense of Panama City and Larry Cretul, both working for the chamber, sat in the front row.

Mary Ellen Klas can be reached at meklas@MiamiHerald.com or on Twitter @MaryEllenKlas
dealsaver
The Miami Herald: Subscribe now!

More from
Florida

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

We have introduced a new commenting system called Disqus for our articles. This allows readers the option of signing in using their Facebook, Twitter, Disqus or existing MiamiHerald.com username and password.

Having problems? Read more about the commenting system on MiamiHerald.com.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK
0 comments

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category