Guantánamo

  • Logout
  • Member Center

GUANTANAMO

Bitter analogy in war crime case: Indians, al Qaeda

 

Seminoles in 1818 similar to al Qaeda in 2001? Some Pentagon prosecutors appeared to make this analogy to support a Guantánamo war crimes conviction, then clarified in a war court filing.

 

President Andrew Jackson.
President Andrew Jackson.

The Bush administration and Congress created the Court of Military Commissions Review after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks to decide the appeals of decisions by military judges and juries at the Guantánamo war court. The panel that heard last week’s appeals in the cases of Osama bin Laden driver Salim Hamdan and Bin Laden media secretary Ali Hamza al Bahlul: U.S. Air Force Col. Barbara Brand, as presiding judge, with U.S. Army Cols. David Conn, Theresa Gallagher, John Hoffman and Martin Sims; Air Force Col. William Orr Jr., Marine Corps Col. Joseph Perak and Navy Capt. Eric Price.


crosenberg@miamiherald.com

“One can make the argument that al Qaeda is the aggressors,” he told The Miami Herald from Gainesville, “but the Seminoles were the innocent targets.”

“It was Jackson invading the territory of a sovereign country, Spain, and he’s executing within that territory citizens of another sovereign country, Britain.”

By Monday, the chief Pentagon War Crimes prosecutor, Navy Capt. John F. Murphy, along with Gilligan and White, notified the appeals court that the government did not object to a National Congress of American Indians filing.

Moreover, the prosecutors acknowledged that the Seminole portion of the brief “could have benefited from greater precision.”

The government “in no way questions or impugns the valor, bravery and honorable military service of Native Americans, past and present,’’ the prosecutors wrote, adding that the Military Commissions prosecution team “does not, in fact, equate the conduct of the Seminoles in 1817-1818 with that of al Qaeda and its affiliated terrorist group.”

Rather, they wrote, the government “cites General Jackson’s campaign and the tribunals he convened not as an example of moral right but as legal precedent: the morality or propriety of General Jackson’s military operation in Florida is irrelevant.”

Defense lawyers, however, urged the court to ignore the Seminole argument.

In Florida, the Seminoles first learned of the brouhaha from a Miami Herald reporter.

General Counsel Jim Shore declared the tribe’s 3,500 members “deeply offended” by the government position.

“To equate the historic struggle of our ancestors in resisting General Andrew Jackson’s unlawful invasion of our homeland to al Qaeda terrorism is a vicious distortion of well-documented history,” he said Wednesday.

Shore said he would soon write Defense Secretary Roberts Gates “demanding” that the government withdraw the offending portion of the brief.

“The Government’s strained comparison of Native Americans to al Qaeda is disrespectful to our Tribe, all American Indians and our American Indian military veterans, as well as those in active military service,” he said.

dealsaver
The Miami Herald: Subscribe now!

More from
Guantánamo

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

We have introduced a new commenting system called Disqus for our articles. This allows readers the option of signing in using their Facebook, Twitter, Disqus or existing MiamiHerald.com username and password.

Having problems? Read more about the commenting system on MiamiHerald.com.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK
0 comments

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category